You are here: Home News News archive Large overlap in grammatical processing for speaking and comprehending

This content is archived, it could be outdated.

Large overlap in grammatical processing for speaking and comprehending

Contrary to popular belief, our cognitive system contains only one mechanism for grammatical encoding and decoding, as shown in a MPI/Leiden University study that was recently published in the journal Language and Cognitive Processes. Is it time to revise all theories of language performance that presuppose separate mechanisms for the grammatical aspects of language production and language comprehension? Parmenides of Elea would think so!
Large overlap in grammatical processing for speaking and comprehending

Photo Brian W. Ogilvie

August 31, 2011

In ancient times, the Morning Star and the Evening Star were believed to be two different celestial bodies. It was Parmenides of Elea (around 500 B.C.) who discovered that they in fact were the same planet. A similar type of discovery was recently made in the area of natural language processing. According to mainstream psycholinguistics, the cognitive processes that enable speakers to produce grammatically well-formed sentences are largely different from those underlying the grammatical analysis of perceived sentences during language comprehension. But this view has now been challenged.

Large overlap in processing mechanisms

MPI researcher Gerard Kempen and his colleagues Nomi Olsthoorn and Simone Sprenger have discovered that the mechanism responsible for constructing the grammatical form of sentences during speaking and writing, called grammatical encoding, overlaps to a large extent with the mechanism that analyses the structure of perceived sentences as part of the comprehension process, grammatical decoding. Using a new method called 'grammatical multitasking', language users had to carry out a decoding task quasi-simultaneously with an encoding task. While reading a printed input sentence, they had to produce a spoken output sentence that had the same meaning as the input sentence, but a different grammatical form (i.e., a syntactic paraphrase). 

The results indicate that in the decoding process people spontaneously treated the syntactic structure of the paraphrase as if it was the structure of the input sentence. Blatant syntax errors in the sentence being read were systematically overlooked if the erroneous words fitted with the structure encoded for the paraphrase. Kempen explains: "Apparently, the grammatical decoding and encoding processes share a common workspace for syntactic structure formation and can hardly avoid operating on one another's products. This means that the cognitive mechanisms for grammatical encoding and grammatical decoding are overlapping to a large extent: a finding that has widespread consequences for psycholinguistic theories of grammatical encoding and decoding."

Conversation

Bronze by Juan Munoz, Spain

In our daily lives, we have to produce and comprehend language at the same time, Kempen continues. "In a conversation, for instance, we sometimes produce a comment or reply already before the other person finishes speaking (overlapping dialogue turns). While talking, we listen to our own speech in order to spot and quickly rectify erroneous or infelicitous utterances (self-monitoring). If we are fluent in more than one language, some of us can translate between these languages online (simultaneous interpreting). Language production and comprehension in parallel is commonplace when dealing with written and sign language as well. Interpreters for the deaf listen and sign at the same time."

No two things at the same time

Gerard Kempen"All these phenomena seem to suggest that language users are capable of language production and language comprehension at physically the same point in time (true simultaneity), supporting our intuitive belief that grammatical encoding and grammatical decoding are subserved by separate cognitive mechanisms: One mechanism cannot do two things at the same time. However, if our cognitive system hosts only one 'grammatical coder', we must assume that the apparent simultaneity is superficial and that, in reality, the coder is performing encoding and decoding tasks alternately." In their paper, the authors argue that there is no hard evidence for true simultaneity of grammatical encoding and decoding.

Minimal overlap in time

Kempen also refers to a publication of MPI researchers Tanya Stivers, Nick Enfield, Stephen Levinson et al. (PNAS 2009), in which they show that the temporal overlap between dialogue turns is minimal and is restricted to intervals where the speaker who interrupts could have anticipated and predicted the grammatical structure of the other speaker’s contribution and thus only needs to encode his or her own contribution (see also our news archive).

Link to the publication.

Gerard.Kempen@mpi.nl

Last checked 2011-10-21 by Myrna Tinbergen
Max Planck Institute
About MPI

 

The Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics is an institute of the German Max Planck Society. Our mission is to undertake basic research into the psychological,social and biological foundations of language. The goal is to understand how our minds and brains process language, how language interacts with other aspects of mind, and how we can learn languages of quite different types.

The institute is situated on the campus of the Radboud University. We participate in the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, and have particularly close ties to that institute's Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging. We also participate in the Centre for Language Studies. A joint graduate school, the IMPRS in Language Sciences, links the Donders Institute, the CLS and the MPI.

 

Max Planck Institute
for Psycholinguistics


Street address
Wundtlaan 1
6525 XD Nijmegen
The Netherlands


Mailing address
P.O. Box 310
6500 AH Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Phone:   +31-24-3521911
Fax:        +31-24-3521213
E-mail:   

Image right

scrabble