Displaying 1 - 21 of 21
-
Baayen, H., & Danziger, E. (1993). Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics: Annual Report Nr.14 1993. Nijmegen: MPI for Psycholinguistics.
-
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1993). Linguistic and nonlinguistic coding of spatial arrays: Explorations in Mayan cognition. Working Paper 24. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
-
Dijkstra, T., & Kempen, G. (
Eds. ). (1993). Einführung in die Psycholinguistik. München: Hans Huber. -
Dijkstra, T. (1993). Taalpsychologie (G. Kempen,
Ed. ). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff. -
Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (
Eds. ). (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. -
Hagoort, P. (
Ed. ). (2019). Human language: From genes and brains to behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. -
Kempen, G. (1993). Spraakkunst als bouwkunst [Inaugural lecture]. Leiden: University of Leiden.
-
Klein, W., & Kreuzer, H. (
Eds. ). (1969). Literarische und naturwissenschaftliche Intelligenz. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. -
Levelt, W. J. M. (
Ed. ). (1996). Advanced psycholinguistics: A Bressanone retrospective for Giovanni B. Flores d'Arcais. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. -
Levelt, W. J. M. (
Ed. ). (1993). Lexical access in speech production. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Abstract
Formerly published in: Cognition : international journal of cognitive science, vol. 42, nos. 1-3, 1992 -
Levinson, S. C. (1993). La Pragmatica [Italian translation of Pragmatics]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
-
Lutte, G., Mönks, F., Kempen, G., & Sarti, S. (1969). Ideaalbeelden van de Europese jeugd: Onderzoek in zeven landen van Europa: België - Belgique, Bundesrepublik Deutschland, España, France, Italia, Nederland, Portugal. 's-Hertogenbosch: L.C.G. Malmberg.
-
Marslen-Wilsen, W., & Tyler, L. K. (
Eds. ). (1980). Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics: Annual Report Nr.1 1980. Nijmegen: MPI for Psycholinguistics. -
Otake, T., & Cutler, A. (
Eds. ). (1996). Phonological structure and language processing: Cross-linguistic studies. Berlin: Mounton de Gruyter. -
De Ruiter, J. P., & Wilkins, D. (
Eds. ). (1996). Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics: Annual report 1996. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. -
Senft, G. (1996). Classificatory particles in Kilivila. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1969). Operators and nucleus: A contribution to the theory of grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1996). Semantic syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
-
Skiba, R., Ross, E., & Kern, F. (1996). Facharbeiter und Fremdsprachen: Fremdsprachenbedarf und Fremdsprachennutzung in technischen Arbeitsfeldern: eine qualitative Untersuchung. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
-
Spapé, M., Verdonschot, R. G., & Van Steenbergen, H. (2019). The E-Primer: An introduction to creating psychological experiments in E-Prime® (2nd ed. updated for E-Prime 3). Leiden: Leiden University Press.
Abstract
E-Prime® is the leading software suite by Psychology Software Tools for designing and running Psychology lab experiments. The E-Primer is the perfect accompanying guide: It provides all the necessary knowledge to make E-Prime accessible to everyone. You can learn the tools of Psychological science by following the E-Primer through a series of entertaining, step-by-step recipes that recreate classic experiments. The updated E-Primer expands its proven combination of simple explanations, interesting tutorials and fun exercises, and makes even the novice student quickly confident to create their dream experiment. -
Speed, L. J., O'Meara, C., San Roque, L., & Majid, A. (
Eds. ). (2019). Perception Metaphors. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Abstract
Metaphor allows us to think and talk about one thing in terms of another, ratcheting up our cognitive and expressive capacity. It gives us concrete terms for abstract phenomena, for example, ideas become things we can grasp or let go of. Perceptual experience—characterised as physical and relatively concrete—should be an ideal source domain in metaphor, and a less likely target. But is this the case across diverse languages? And are some sensory modalities perhaps more concrete than others? This volume presents critical new data on perception metaphors from over 40 languages, including many which are under-studied. Aside from the wealth of data from diverse languages—modern and historical; spoken and signed—a variety of methods (e.g., natural language corpora, experimental) and theoretical approaches are brought together. This collection highlights how perception metaphor can offer both a bedrock of common experience and a source of continuing innovation in human communication
Share this page