Displaying 1 - 20 of 20
-
Kempen, G. (1984). Taaltechnologie voor het Nederlands: Vorderingen bij de bouw van een Nederlandstalig dialoog- en auteursysteem. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 19, 48-58.
-
Kempen, G., Konst, L., & De Smedt, K. (1984). Taaltechnologie voor het Nederlands: Vorderingen bij de bouw van een Nederlandstalig dialoog- en auteursysteem. Informatie, 26, 878-881.
-
Klein, W. (1968). Zur Kategorisierung der Funktionsverbgefüge. Beiträge zur Linguistik und Informationsverarbeitung, 13, 7-37.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1968). [Review of the book] R.C. Oldfield en J.C. Marshall (eds.), Language. Selected readings. Nederlands tijdschrift voor de psychologie, 23, 474.
-
Levelt, W. J. M., & Plomp, R. (1962). Musical consonance and critical bandwidth. In Proceedings of the 4th International Congress Acoustics (pp. 55-55).
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1968). Hans Hörmann, Psychologie der Sprache [Book review]. Lingua, 20, 93-97. doi:10.1016/0024-3841(68)90133-2.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1968). Om der wille van het taalpsychologisch experiment. Forum der Letteren, 21, 927-928.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1968). R. Quirk en J. Svartvik (eds.), Investigating linguistic acceptability [Book review]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor de psychologie, 32(6), 692.
-
Levelt, W. J. M., & Plomp, K. (1968). The appreciation of musical intervals. In J. M. M. Aler (
Ed. ), Proceedings of the fifth International Congress of Aesthetics, Amsterdam 1964 (pp. 901-904). The Hague: Mouton. -
Levelt, W. J. M. (1984). Spontaneous self-repairs in speech: Processes and representations. In M. P. R. Van den Broecke, & A. Cohen (
Eds. ), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 105-117). Dordrecht: Foris. -
Levelt, W. J. M. (1984). Sprache und Raum. Texten und Schreiben, 20, 18-21.
-
Levelt, W. J. M., & Bonarius, M. (1968). Suffixes as deep structure clues. Heymans Bulletins Psychologische Instituten RU Groningen, HB-68-22EX.
-
De Loor, G. P., Jurriens, A. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Van de Geer, J. P. (1968). Line scan imagery interpretation. Photogrammatic Engineering, 28, 502-510.
-
Scott, D. R., & Cutler, A. (1984). Segmental phonology and the perception of syntactic structure. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 450-466. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science//journal/00225371.
Abstract
Recent research in speech production has shown that syntactic structure is reflected in segmental phonology--the application of certain phonological rules of English (e.g., palatalization and alveolar flapping) is inhibited across phrase boundaries. We examined whether such segmental effects can be used in speech perception as cues to syntactic structure, and the relation between the use of these segmental features as syntactic markers in production and perception. Speakers of American English (a dialect in which the above segmental effects occur) could indeed use the segmental cues in syntax perception; speakers of British English (in which the effects do not occur) were unable to make use of them, while speakers of British English who were long-term residents of the United States showed intermediate performance. -
Seuren, P. A. M. (1968). [Review of the book Negation and the comparative particle in English by André Joly]. Neophilologus, 52, 337-338. doi:10.1007/BF01515481.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1984). Logic and truth-values in language. In F. Landman, & F. Veltman (
Eds. ), Varieties of formal semantics: Proceedings of the fourth Amsterdam colloquium (pp. 343-364). Dordrecht: Foris. -
Seuren, P. A. M. (1984). Operator lowering. Linguistics, 22(5), 573-627. doi:10.1515/ling.1984.22.5.573.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1984). The bioprogram hypothesis: Facts and fancy. A commentary on Bickerton "The language bioprogram hypothesis". Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 208-209. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00044356.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1984). The comparative revisited. Journal of Semantics, 3(1), 109-141. doi:10.1093/jos/3.1-2.109.
-
Van de Geer, J. P., Levelt, W. J. M., & Plomp, R. (1962). The connotation of musical consonance. Acta Psychologica, 20, 308-319.
Abstract
As a preliminary to further research on musical consonance an explanatory investigation was made on the different modes of judgment of musical intervals. This was done by way of a semantic differential. Subjects rated 23 intervals against 10 scales. In a factor analysis three factors appeared: pitch, evaluation and fusion. The relation between these factors and some physical characteristics has been investigated. The scale consonant-dissonant showed to be purely evaluative (in opposition to Stumpf's theory). This evaluative connotation is not in accordance with the musicological meaning of consonance. Suggestions to account for this difference have been given.
Share this page