Publications

Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
  • Kempen, G. (1966). [Review of the book Theories of learning and instruction ed. by E.R. Hilgard]. Nijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 14, 250.
  • Kempen, G. (1966). Een informatietheoretische reïnterpretatie van het probleem der autonome geheugenveranderingen. Gawein: Tijdschrift voor psychologie, 15, 9-26.
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). Generatieve grammatica en psycholinguïstiek I: Inleiding in de generatieve grammatica. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 21, 317-337.
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). Generatieve grammatica en psycholinguïstiek II. Psycholinguïstisch onderzoek. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 21, 367-400.
  • Levelt, W. J. M., & Plomp, R. (1966). Les dimensions dans la perception des intervalles musicaux. Sciences de l'art, 3, 172-182.
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). Some demonstrations of the complementary functioning of the eyes. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 39-40.
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). The alternation process in binocular rivalry. British Journal of Psychology, 57(3/4), 225-238.
  • Levelt, W. J. M., Van de Geer, J. P., & Plomp, R. (1966). Triadic comparisons of musical intervals. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 19(2), 163-179.
  • Seuren, P. A. M. (1966). [Review of the book An introduction to morphology and syntax by Benjamin Elson and Velma Pickett]. Foundations of Language, 2(2), 213-217.
  • Seuren, P. A. M. (1966). [Review of the book Grammar discovery procedures by Robert E. Longacre]. Foundations of Language, 2(2), 200-212.
  • Seuren, P. A. M. (1963). Naar aanleiding van Dr. F. Balk-Smit Duyzentkunst "De Grammatische Functie". Levende Talen, 219, 179-186.
  • Seuren, P. A. M. (1966). Het probleem van de woorddefinitie. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde, 82(4), 259-293.
  • Van de Geer, J. P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1963). Detection of visual patterns disturbed by noise: An exploratory study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 192-204. doi:10.1080/17470216308416324.

    Abstract

    An introductory study of the perception of stochastically specified events is reported. The initial problem was to determine whether the perceiver can split visual input data of this kind into random and determined components. The inability of subjects to do so with the stimulus material used (a filmlike sequence of dot patterns), led to the more general question of how subjects code this kind of visual material. To meet the difficulty of defining the subjects' responses, two experiments were designed. In both, patterns were presented as a rapid sequence of dots on a screen. The patterns were more or less disturbed by “noise,” i.e. the dots did not appear exactly at their proper places. In the first experiment the response was a rating on a semantic scale, in the second an identification from among a set of alternative patterns. The results of these experiments give some insight in the coding systems adopted by the subjects. First, noise appears to be detrimental to pattern recognition, especially to patterns with little spread. Second, this shows connections with the factors obtained from analysis of the semantic ratings, e.g. easily disturbed patterns show a large drop in the semantic regularity factor, when only a little noise is added.

Share this page