Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
-
Verdonschot, R. G., Van der Wal, J., Lewis, A. G., Knudsen, B., Von Grebmer zu Wolfsthurn, S., Schiller, N. O., & Hagoort, P. (2024). Information structure in Makhuwa: Electrophysiological evidence for a universal processing account. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(30): e2315438121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2315438121.
Abstract
There is evidence from both behavior and brain activity that the way information is structured, through the use of focus, can up-regulate processing of focused constituents, likely to give prominence to the relevant aspects of the input. This is hypothesized to be universal, regardless of the different ways in which languages encode focus. In order to test this universalist hypothesis, we need to go beyond the more familiar linguistic strategies for marking focus, such as by means of intonation or specific syntactic structures (e.g., it-clefts). Therefore, in this study, we examine Makhuwa-Enahara, a Bantu language spoken in northern Mozambique, which uniquely marks focus through verbal conjugation. The participants were presented with sentences that consisted of either a semantically anomalous constituent or a semantically nonanomalous constituent. Moreover, focus on this particular constituent could be either present or absent. We observed a consistent pattern: Focused information generated a more negative N400 response than the same information in nonfocus position. This demonstrates that regardless of how focus is marked, its consequence seems to result in an upregulation of processing of information that is in focus.Additional information
supplementary materials -
Knudsen, B., Fischer, M., & Aschersleben, G. (2014). Development of Spatial Preferences for Counting and Picture Naming. Psychological Research, 79, 939-949. doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0623-z.
Abstract
The direction of object enumeration reflects children’s enculturation but previous work on the development of such spatial preferences has been inconsistent. Therefore, we documented directional preferences in finger counting, object counting, and picture naming for children (4 groups from 3 to 6 years, N = 104) and adults (N = 56). We found a right-side preference for finger counting in 3- to 6-year-olds and a left-side preference for counting objects and naming pictures by 6 years of age. Children were consistent in their special preferences when comparing object counting and picture naming, but not in other task pairings. Finally, spatial preferences were not related to cardinality comprehension. These results, together with other recent work, suggest a gradual development of spatial-numerical associations from early non-directional mappings into culturally constrained directional mappings.
Share this page