Presentations

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4
  • He, J., Meyer, A. S., Creemers, A., & Brehm, L. (2022). How to conduct language production research online: A web-based study of semantic context and name agreement effects in multi-word production. Poster presented at the 18th NVP Winter Conference on Brain and Cognition, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands.
  • Brehm, L., & Alday, P. M. (2020). A decade of mixed models: It’s past time to set your contrasts. Talk presented at the 26th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLap 2020). Potsdam, Germany. 2020-09-03 - 2020-09-05.
  • Zormpa, E., Meyer, A. S., & Brehm, L. (2020). Communicative intentions influence memory for conversations. Poster presented at the 26th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLap 2020), Potsdam, Germany.
  • Zormpa, E., Meyer, A. S., & Brehm, L. (2020). Answers are remembered better than the questions themselves. Poster presented at the Experimental Psychology Society (EPS) Meeting, Kent, Canterbury.

    Abstract

    When we communicate, we often use language to identify and successfully transmit new information. We can highlight new and important information by focussing it through pitch, syntactic structure, or semantic content. Previous work has shown that focussed information is remembered better than neutral or unfocussed information. However, most of this work has used structures, like clefts and pseudo-clefts, that are rarely found in communication. We used spoken question-answer pairs, a frequent structure where the answers are focussed relative to the questions, to examine whether answers are remembered better than questions. On each trial, participants (n=48) saw three pictures on the screen while listening to a recorded question-answer exchange between two people, such as “What should move under the crab? – The sunflower!”. In an online Yes/No recognition memory test on the next day, participants recognised the names of pictures that appeared as answers 6% more accurately than the names of pictures that appeared as questions (β = 0.27, Wald z = 4.51, 95% CI = 0.15, 0.39, p = < 0.001). Thus, linguistic focus affected memory for the words of an overheard conversation. We discuss the methodological and theoretical implications of the findings for studies of conversation.

    Additional information

    https://osf.io/w72r4/

Share this page