Publications

Abstract

The information we obtain from how speakers sound—for example their accent—affects how we interpret the messages they convey. A clear example is foreign accented speech, where reduced intelligibility and speaker's social categorization (out-group member) affect memory and the credibility of the message (e.g., less trustworthiness). In the present study, we go one step further and ask whether evaluations of messages are also affected by regional accents—accents from a different region than the listener. In the current study, we report results from three experiments on immediate memory recognition and immediate credibility assessments as well as the illusory truth effect. These revealed no differences between messages conveyed in local—from the same region as the participant—and regional accents—from native speakers of a different country than the participants. Our results suggest that when the accent of a speaker has high intelligibility, social categorization by accent does not seem to negatively affect how we treat the speakers' messages.

Abstract

The information we obtain from how speakers sound—for example their accent—affects how we interpret the
messages they convey. A clear example is foreign accented speech, where reduced intelligibility and speaker's
social categorization (out-group member) affect memory and the credibility of the message (e.g., less trust-
worthiness). In the present study, we go one step further and ask whether evaluations of messages are also
affected by regional accents—accents from a different region than the listener. In the current study, we report
results from three experiments on immediate memory recognition and immediate credibility assessments as well
as the illusory truth effect. These revealed no differences between messages conveyed in local—from the same
region as the participant—and regional accents—from native speakers of a different country than the partici-
pants. Our results suggest that when the accent of a speaker has high intelligibility, social categorization by
accent does not seem to negatively affect how we treat the speakers' messages.

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that long-lasting morphologic and
functional consequences can be present in the human visual system
after repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (r-mTBI). The exact lo-
cation and extent of the damage in this condition are not well un-
derstood. Using a recently developed mouse model of r-mTBI, we
assessed the effects on the retina and optic nerve using histology and
immunohistochemistry, electroretinography (ERG), and spectral-
domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at 10 and 13 weeks
after injury. Control mice received repetitive anesthesia alone (r-sham).
We observed decreased optic nerve diameters and increased cellularity
and areas of demyelination in optic nerves in r-mTBI versus r-sham
mice. There were concomitant areas of decreased cellularity in the
retinal ganglion cell layer and approximately 67% decrease in brain-
specific homeobox/POU domain protein 3AYpositive retinal ganglion
cells in retinal flat mounts. Furthermore, SD-OCT demonstrated a de-
tectable thinning of the inner retina; ERG demonstrated a decrease in
the amplitude of the photopic negative response without any change in
a- or b-wave amplitude or timing. Thus, the ERG and SD-OCT data
correlated well with changes detected by morphometric, histologic,
and immunohistochemical methods, thereby supporting the use of
these noninvasive methods in the assessment of visual function and
morphology in clinical cases of mTBI.