Publications

Abstract

During vocal communication, the spectro‑temporal structure of vocalizations conveys important
contextual information. Bats excel in the use of sounds for echolocation by meticulous encoding of
signals in the temporal domain. We therefore hypothesized that for social communication as well,
bats would excel at detecting minute distortions in the spectro‑temporal structure of calls. To test
this hypothesis, we systematically introduced spectro‑temporal distortion to communication calls of
Phyllostomus discolor bats. We broke down each call into windows of the same length and randomized
the phase spectrum inside each window. The overall degree of spectro‑temporal distortion in
communication calls increased with window length. Modelling the bat auditory periphery revealed
that cochlear mechanisms allow discrimination of fast spectro‑temporal envelopes. We evaluated
model predictions with experimental psychophysical and neurophysiological data. We first assessed
bats’ performance in discriminating original versions of calls from increasingly distorted versions of
the same calls. We further examined cortical responses to determine additional specializations for
call discrimination at the cortical level. Psychophysical and cortical responses concurred with model
predictions, revealing discrimination thresholds in the range of 8–15 ms randomization‑window
length. Our data suggest that specialized cortical areas are not necessary to impart psychophysical
resilience to temporal distortion in communication calls.

Abstract

Vocal production learning (VPL) is the capacity to learn to produce new vocalizations, which is a rare ability in the animal kingdom and thus far has only been identified in a handful of mammalian taxa and three groups of birds. Over the last few decades, approaches to the demonstration of VPL have varied among taxa, sound production systems and functions. These discrepancies strongly impede direct comparisons between studies. In the light of the growing number of experimental studies reporting VPL, the need for comparability is becoming more and more pressing. The comparative evaluation of VPL across studies would be facilitated by unified and generalized reporting standards, which would allow a better positioning of species on any proposed VPL continuum. In this paper, we specifically highlight five factors influencing the comparability of VPL assessments: (i) comparison to an acoustic baseline, (ii) comprehensive reporting of acoustic parameters, (iii) extended reporting of training conditions and durations, (iv) investigating VPL function via behavioural, perception-based experiments and (v) validation of findings on a neuronal level. These guidelines emphasize the importance of comparability between studies in order to unify the field of vocal learning.