Displaying 2301 - 2312 of 2312
-
Zwitserlood, I. (2010). De Nederlandse Gebarentaal, het Corpus NGT en het ERK. Levende Talen Magazine, 2010(8), 44-45.
-
Zwitserlood, I. (2011). Gebruiksgemak van het eerste Nederlandse Gebarentaal woordenboek kan beter [Book review]. Levende Talen Magazine, 4, 46-47.
Abstract
Review: User friendliness of the first dictionary of Sign Language of the Netherlands can be improved -
Zwitserlood, I. (2011). Gevraagd: medewerkers verzorgingshuis met een goede oog-handcoördinatie. Het meten van NGT-vaardigheid. Levende Talen Magazine, 1, 44-46.
Abstract
(Needed: staff for residential care home with good eye-hand coordination. Measuring NGT-skills.) -
Zwitserlood, I. (2002). Klassifikatoren in der Niederländischen Gebärdensprache (NGT). In H. Leuniger, & K. Wempe (
Eds. ), Gebärdensprachlinguistik 2000. Theorie und Anwendung. Vorträge vom Symposium "Gebärdensprachforschung im deutschsprachigem Raum", Frankfurt a.M., 11.-13. Juni 1999 (pp. 113-126). Hamburg: Signum Verlag. -
Zwitserlood, I. (2010). Laat je vingers spreken: NGT en vingerspelling. Levende Talen Magazine, 2010(2), 46-47.
-
Zwitserlood, I. (2011). Het Corpus NGT en de dagelijkse lespraktijk. Levende Talen Magazine, 6, 46.
Abstract
(The Corpus NGT and the daily practice of language teaching) -
Zwitserlood, I. (2010). Het Corpus NGT en de dagelijkse lespraktijk (2). Levende Talen Magazine, 2010(3), 47-48.
-
Zwitserlood, I. (2011). Het Corpus NGT en de opleiding leraar/tolk NGT. Levende Talen Magazine, 1, 40-41.
Abstract
(The Corpus NGT and teacher NGT/interpreter NGT training) -
Zwitserlood, I. (2002). The complex structure of ‘simple’ signs in NGT. In J. Van Koppen, E. Thrift, E. Van der Torre, & M. Zimmermann (
Eds. ), Proceedings of ConSole IX (pp. 232-246).Abstract
In this paper, I argue that components in a set of simple signs in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (also called Sign Language of the Netherlands; henceforth: NGT), i.e. hand configuration (including orientation), movement and place of articulation, can also have morphological status. Evidence for this is provided by: firstly, the fact that handshape, orientation, movement and place of articulation show regular meaningful patterns in signs, which patterns also occur in newly formed signs, and secondly, the gradual change of formerly noninflecting predicates into inflectional predicates. The morphological complexity of signs can best be accounted for in autosegmental morphological templates. -
Zwitserlood, I. (2010). Sign language lexicography in the early 21st century and a recently published dictionary of Sign Language of the Netherlands. International Journal of Lexicography, 23, 443-476. doi:10.1093/ijl/ecq031.
Abstract
Sign language lexicography has thus far been a relatively obscure area in the world of lexicography. Therefore, this article will contain background information on signed languages and the communities in which they are used, on the lexicography of sign languages, the situation in the Netherlands as well as a review of a sign language dictionary that has recently been published in the Netherlands. -
Zwitserlood, I., & Crasborn, O. (2010). Wat kunnen we leren uit een Corpus Nederlandse Gebarentaal? WAP Nieuwsbrief, 28(2), 16-18.
-
Zwitserlood, I. (2010). Verlos ons van de glos. Levende Talen Magazine, 2010(7), 40-41.
Share this page