Displaying 1 - 25 of 25
-
Bowerman, M. (1974). Early development of concepts underlying language. In R. Schiefelbusch, & L. Lloyd (
Eds. ), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention (pp. 191-209). Baltimore: University Park Press. -
Bowerman, M. (1974). Learning the structure of causative verbs: A study in the relationship of cognitive, semantic, and syntactic development. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 8, 142-178.
-
Kempen, G. (1966). Een informatietheoretische reïnterpretatie van het probleem der autonome geheugenveranderingen. Gawein: Tijdschrift voor psychologie, 15, 9-26.
-
Kempen, G. (1966). [Review of the book Theories of learning and instruction ed. by E.R. Hilgard]. Nijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 14, 250.
-
Klein, W. (1974). Critical remarks on generative metrics. Poetics, 12, 29-48.
-
Klein, W. (1974). Variation, Norm und Abweichung in der Sprache. In G. Lotzmann (
Ed. ), Sprach- und Sprechnormen - Verhalten und Abweichung (pp. 7-21). Heidelberg: Groos. -
Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). Generatieve grammatica en psycholinguïstiek I: Inleiding in de generatieve grammatica. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 21, 317-337.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). Generatieve grammatica en psycholinguïstiek II. Psycholinguïstisch onderzoek. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 21, 367-400.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1961). Michotte's theorie van de causaliteitswaarneming en de waarneming van remmingen. Hypothese: orgaan van de Psychologische Faculteit der Leidse Studenten, 5(4), 1-21.
-
Levelt, W. J. M., & Plomp, R. (1966). Les dimensions dans la perception des intervalles musicaux. Sciences de l'art, 3, 172-182.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1974). J.B. Carroll & R. Freedle (eds.), Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge [Book review]. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 26(2), 325-326. doi:10.1080/14640747408400419.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). The alternation process in binocular rivalry. British Journal of Psychology, 57(3/4), 225-238.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). Some demonstrations of the complementary functioning of the eyes. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 39-40.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). The perceptual conflict in binocular rivalry. In M. A. Bouman (
Ed. ), Studies in perception: Dedicated to M.A. Bouman (pp. 47-60). Soesterberg: Institute for Perception RVO-TNO. -
Levelt, W. J. M., Van de Geer, J. P., & Plomp, R. (1966). Triadic comparisons of musical intervals. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 19(2), 163-179.
-
Plomp, R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). Perception of tonal consonance. In M. A. Bouman (
Ed. ), Studies in Perception - dedicated to M.A. Bouman (pp. 105-118). Soesterberg: Institute for Perception RVO-TNO. -
Seuren, P. A. M. (1974). Autonomous versus semantic syntax. In P. A. M. Seuren (
Ed. ), Semantic syntax (pp. 96-122). Oxford: Oxford University Press. -
Seuren, P. A. M. (1966). [Review of the book An introduction to morphology and syntax by Benjamin Elson and Velma Pickett]. Foundations of Language, 2(2), 213-217.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1966). [Review of the book Grammar discovery procedures by Robert E. Longacre]. Foundations of Language, 2(2), 200-212.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1963). Naar aanleiding van Dr. F. Balk-Smit Duyzentkunst "De Grammatische Functie". Levende Talen, 219, 179-186.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1966). Het probleem van de woorddefinitie. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde, 82(4), 259-293.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1974). Introduction. In P. A. M. Seuren (
Ed. ), Semantic syntax (pp. 1-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press. -
Seuren, P. A. M. (1974). Negative's travels. In P. A. M. Seuren (
Ed. ), Semantic syntax (pp. 183-208). Oxford: Oxford University Press. -
Van de Geer, J. P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1963). Detection of visual patterns disturbed by noise: An exploratory study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 192-204. doi:10.1080/17470216308416324.
Abstract
An introductory study of the perception of stochastically specified events is reported. The initial problem was to determine whether the perceiver can split visual input data of this kind into random and determined components. The inability of subjects to do so with the stimulus material used (a filmlike sequence of dot patterns), led to the more general question of how subjects code this kind of visual material. To meet the difficulty of defining the subjects' responses, two experiments were designed. In both, patterns were presented as a rapid sequence of dots on a screen. The patterns were more or less disturbed by “noise,” i.e. the dots did not appear exactly at their proper places. In the first experiment the response was a rating on a semantic scale, in the second an identification from among a set of alternative patterns. The results of these experiments give some insight in the coding systems adopted by the subjects. First, noise appears to be detrimental to pattern recognition, especially to patterns with little spread. Second, this shows connections with the factors obtained from analysis of the semantic ratings, e.g. easily disturbed patterns show a large drop in the semantic regularity factor, when only a little noise is added. -
De Weert, C., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1974). Binocular brightness combinations: Additive and nonadditive aspects. Perception and Psychophysics, 15, 551-562.
Share this page