Displaying 1 - 36 of 36
-
Bowerman, M. (1975). Commentary on L. Bloom, P. Lightbown, & L. Hood, “Structure and variation in child language”. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(2), 80-90. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1165986.
-
Cutler, A. (1972). A note on a reference by J.D. McCawley to adjectives denoting temperature. Linguistics, 87.
-
Cutler, A. (1972). Describing a semantic field. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 67-73.
-
Cutler, A., & Fay, D. (1975). You have a Dictionary in your Head, not a Thesaurus. Texas Linguistic Forum, 1, 27-40.
-
Eggers, H., Klein, W., Rath, R., Rothkegel, A., Weber, H.-J., & Zimmermann, H. (1969). Die automatische Behandlung diskontinuierlicher Konstituenten im Deutschen. Muttersprache, 9/10, 260-266.
-
Kempen, G. (1975). De taalgebruiker in de mens: Schets van zijn bouw en funktie, toepassingen op moedertaal en vreemde taal verwerving. Forum der Letteren, 16, 132-158.
-
Kempen, G., & Boon van Ostade, A. (1969). Een typologie van ideaalbeelden van Europese jeugdigen door middel van de iteratieve clusteranalyse. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 24, 46-60.
-
Kempen, G., Hermans, B., Klinkum, A., Brand, M., & Verhaaren, F. (1969). The word-frequency effect and incongruity perception: Methodological artifacts? Perception and Psychophysics, 5(3), 161-162. doi:10.3758/BF03209549.
Abstract
Two experimental results often reported in support of perceptual interpretations concerning the influence of set on perception are critically examined: (a) the relation between word frequency and recognition threshold, and (b) the so-called compromise reactions between set and stimulus, Alter elimination of certain methodological artifacts (e.g., introduction of a temporal forced-choice method instead of the ascending-limits method), both phenomena disappear; the influence of set on perception appears to be wholly a matter of response bias. -
Kempen, G. (1975). Theoretiseren en experimenteren in de cognitieve psychologie. Gedrag: Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 6, 341-347.
-
Klein, W. (1975). Eine Theorie der Wortstellungsveränderung: Einige kritische Bemerkungen zu Vennemanns Theorie der Sprachentwicklung. Linguistische Berichte, 37(75), 46-57.
-
Klein, W. (1975). Einleitung. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik; Metzler, Stuttgart, 5(18), 7-8.
-
Klein, W. (1975). Zur Sprache ausländischer Arbeiter: Syntaktische Analysen und Aspekte des kommunikativen Verhaltens. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 18, 78-121.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1969). R.N. Haber, Contemporary theory and research in visual perception [Book review]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor de psychologie, 24, 463-464.
-
Levelt, W. J. M., Riemersma, J. B., & Bunt, A. A. (1972). Binaural additivity of loudness. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 25, 51-68.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1969). A re-analysis of some adjective/noun intersection data. Heymans Bulletins, HB-69-31EX.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1969). E.J. Brière, A psycholinguistic study of phonological interference [Book review]. Lingua, 22, 119-120.
-
Levelt, W. J. M., Zwanenburg, W., & Ouweneel, G. R. E. (1969). Ambiguous surface structure and phonetic form in French. Heymans Bulletins, (HB-69-28EX).
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1972). [Review of the book Psychometric methods in the study of meaning]. Contemporary Psychology, 17, 586-587.
Abstract
Review of S. Fillenbaum and A. Rapoport, Structures in the subjective lexicon -
Levelt, W. J. M. (1972). Hans Hörmann, Psycholinguistics: An introduction to research and theory [Book review]. Nijmeegs tijdschrift voor psychologie, 20(3), 168-169.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1969). Hierarchical chunking in sentence processing. Heymans Bulletins, HB-69-31EX.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1969). Psychological representations of syntactic structures. Heymans Bulletins, HB-69-36EX.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1969). R.M. Warren en R.P. Warren, Helmholtz on perception, its physiology and development [Book review]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor de psychologie, 24, 463-464.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1972). Some psychological aspects of linguistic data. Linguistische Berichte, 17, 18-30.
-
Levelt, W. J. M., & Ouweneel, G. R. E. (1969). The perception of French sentences with a surface ambiguity. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 24, 245-248.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1969). The perception of syntactic structure. Heymans Bulletins, HB-69-30EX.
-
Levelt, W. J. M. (1969). The scaling of syntactic relatedness: A new method in psycholinguistic research. Psychonomic Science, 17(6), 351-352.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1972). Autonomous versus semantic syntax. Foundations of Language, 8(2), 237-265.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1969). Echte en onechte taalkunde. De Gids, 132, 225-242.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1972). [Review of the book La Struttura dell'Italiano by Robert A. Hall Jr.]. Neophilologus, 56(4), 503-504. doi:10.1007/BF01515299.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1972). [Review of the book Subjonctif et hypotaxe en italien. Une esquisse de la syntaxe du subjonctif dans les propositions subordonndes en italien contemporain by Jorgen Schmitt Jensen]. Neophilologus, 56(3), 370-371. doi:10.1007/BF01515507.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1969). [Review of the book Writing transformational grammars by Andreas Koutsoudas]. Journal of Linguistics, 5(1), 188-189. doi:10.1017/S0022226700002188.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1963). Naar aanleiding van Dr. F. Balk-Smit Duyzentkunst "De Grammatische Functie". Levende Talen, 219, 179-186.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1969). La G.G.T. et la théorie de la traduction. Le Langage et l'Homme, 10, 41-50.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1972). Sociolinguïstische overpeinzingen bij een Penguin. Spektator, 2(3), 125-146.
-
Seuren, P. A. M. (1972). Taaluniversalia in de transformationele grammatika. Leuvense Bijdragen, 61(4), 311-370.
-
Van de Geer, J. P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1963). Detection of visual patterns disturbed by noise: An exploratory study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 192-204. doi:10.1080/17470216308416324.
Abstract
An introductory study of the perception of stochastically specified events is reported. The initial problem was to determine whether the perceiver can split visual input data of this kind into random and determined components. The inability of subjects to do so with the stimulus material used (a filmlike sequence of dot patterns), led to the more general question of how subjects code this kind of visual material. To meet the difficulty of defining the subjects' responses, two experiments were designed. In both, patterns were presented as a rapid sequence of dots on a screen. The patterns were more or less disturbed by “noise,” i.e. the dots did not appear exactly at their proper places. In the first experiment the response was a rating on a semantic scale, in the second an identification from among a set of alternative patterns. The results of these experiments give some insight in the coding systems adopted by the subjects. First, noise appears to be detrimental to pattern recognition, especially to patterns with little spread. Second, this shows connections with the factors obtained from analysis of the semantic ratings, e.g. easily disturbed patterns show a large drop in the semantic regularity factor, when only a little noise is added.
Share this page