The evolution of tag-based cooperation in humans: The case for accent
Recent game-theoretic simulation and analytical models have demonstrated that cooperative strategies mediated by indicators of cooperative potential, or “tags,” can invade, spread, and resist invasion by noncooperators across a
range of population-structure and cost-benefit scenarios. The plausibility of these models is potentially relevant for
human evolutionary accounts insofar as humans possess some phenotypic trait that could serve as a reliable tag. Linguistic markers, such as accent and dialect, have frequently been either cursorily defended or promptly dismissed as satisfying the criteria of a reliable and evolutionarily viable tag. This paper integrates evidence from a range of disciplines to develop and assess the claim that speech accent mediated the evolution of tag-based cooperation in humans. Existing evidence warrants the preliminary conclusion that accent markers meet the demands of an
evolutionarily viable tag and potentially afforded a cost-effective solution to the challenges of maintaining viable
cooperative relationships in diffuse, regional social networks.
Share this page