There are some historical divisions in methods, rationales, and purposes between
studies on comparative cognition and behavioural ecology. In turn, the interaction between
these two branches and studies from mathematics, computation and neuroscience is not
usual. In this short piece, we attempt to build bridges among these disciplines. We present a
series of interconnected vignettes meant to illustrate how a more interdisciplinary approach
looks like when successful, and its advantages. Concretely, we focus on a recent topic,
namely animal rhythms in interaction, studied under different approaches. We showcase 5
research efforts, which we believe successfully link 5 particular Scientific areas of rhythm
research conceptualized as: Social neuroscience, Detailed rhythmic quantification,
Ontogeny, Computational approaches and Spontaneous interactions. Our suggestions will
hopefully spur a ‘Comparative rhythms in interaction’ field, which can integrate and
capitalize on knowledge from zoology, comparative psychology, neuroscience, and
computation.